Featured Posts

General MIDI by Stanley Jungleib - Read it for Free... When Stanley Jungleib wrote General MIDI in the mid-1990's the electronic music landscape was filled by hardware synthesizers and software sequencers. A decade later, real-time software synths -which Seer...

Readmore

Seer Systems Demands Retraction from the Electronic... Stanley Jungleib, Chairman If free speech depends on the judgment and methods of EFF’s current leadership, then they endanger everyone’s freedom. I began working in music synthesis in 1979, through...

Readmore

Seer Systems Demands Retraction from the Electronic... Stanley Jungleib, Chairman If free speech depends on the judgment and methods of EFF’s current leadership, then they endanger everyone’s freedom. I began working in music synthesis in 1979, through...

Readmore

Evolution of the Seer '274 Patent In recent years, the software synthesizer market has come into full swing and digital audio is something that consumers have come to expect in everything from personal computers to mobile phones and cars....

Readmore

Evolution of the Seer ’274 Patent In recent years, the software synthesizer market has come into full swing and digital audio is something that consumers have come to expect in everything from personal computers to mobile phones and cars....

Readmore

  • Prev
  • Next

Seer Systems Vindicated

Posted on : 02-11-2010 | By : admin | In : Seer History, Technology Licensing, Uncategorized

Tags: , , , , ,

1

“Patent Bust” of Seer Systems’ Electronic Music Patent Sunk By USPTO Action

San Francisco, CA – October 29, 2010 – The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has rejected the EFF’s “Patent Busting” re-examination attack on Seer Systems’ patent #5,886,274. According to the EFF’s website, Seer and its ’274 patent were “Wanted by EFF Marshalls” for “Crimes Against the Public Domain; Willful Ignorance of Prior Art; Eggregious Display of Obviousness.” The USPTO disagreed, ruling that the core original claims of the ’274 patent are valid, as are six newly-added claims. From a technical standpoint the entire affair cost Seer only a few minor amendments of wording that rendered three of the original claims in the ‘274 patent no longer necessary.

Founder and Chairman Stanley Jungleib, responds: “Seer’s ‘274 Patent inventing scalable digital audio distribution has now withstood all reasonable tests and challenges. Seer Systems has already settled litigation with Microsoft, Yamaha, and Beatnik. Thanks to EFF this Patent has now received enough attention that no one in the MIDI or audio domain can claim ignorance of its validity and implications. Seer Systems looks forward to licensing responsible customers under fair terms. And, as necessary, we will continue defending our intellectual property consistent with our substantial record.”

Seer’s outside litigation counsel, Alex Weyand of the Weyand Law Firm, San Francisco, commented: “Why the EFF did not contact our client first, and instead chose to learn the hard way, remains a mystery.”