Featured Posts

  • Prev
  • Next

Intel Development #8

Posted on : 28-06-1996 | By : admin | In : Seer History

Tags: ,

0

Release to work with Creative Labs.

1996 June

Posted on : 01-06-1996 | By : admin | In : Seer History

Tags: , , , , , ,

0

 

19960610 Creative/Seer Internet Initiative Report

19960620 Creative posts $67M (10%) loss for year – they need a hit!

19960620 Adoption of Stock Option Plan
19960626 A8: Allowing Seer-Creative development

19960627 Biard MacGuineas
19960627 Gints Klimanis

19960628 Creative Escrow Account
19960629 Russ Lujan to be Creative Board rep to Seer

1996 May

Posted on : 01-05-1996 | By : admin | In : Seer History

Tags: , , , , , ,

0

19960501 Opcode wants MIDIRadio Exclusive

19960502 Money Distribution Finalized

19960508 Seer notifies OTL of Creative deal compliance
19960530 MCW renders opinion on interim agt.

19960501 $6M valuation by Creative
19960519 Revocation of S Corp Status

19960531 Intel says it is closing in

NextGen ScrollGallery thumbnail
96 06 ctl shares

1996 March

Posted on : 01-03-1996 | By : admin | In : Seer History

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

0

19960306 Merc news on NSP

19960318 Interim Agt. / Jungleib & Smith Promissory Notes
19960322 Seer offers Reality to Creative – wanted the clock to start on their option asap.
19960324 Letter Agreement
19960324 Amended & Restated Articles of Incorporation

Intel, Microsoft reveal new standards:

NextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnail
9603 INTELSTRDS
960301 Page 1

1996 February

Posted on : 01-02-1996 | By : admin | In : Seer History, Technology Licensing

Tags: , , , , ,

0

19960205 Preferred Stock Financing

19960205 Intel fails decision
19960215 SJ demands release from Intel in their own interest
19960225 Intel-Creative (Microsoft) License Agreement (TLA)

CTL
19960203 TLA draft 2
19960209 SJ report on Intel issue
19960209 No-shop extension

NAMM Announcement of SeerSynth

Posted on : 18-01-1996 | By : admin | In : Seer History

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

0

First affordable synthesizer with multi-timbral physical modeling.

Back: Frank, David ... Front: Greg, Stanley, Dave
Back: Frank, David
Front: Greg, Stanley, Dave

It was worth doing just for the expression on the Korg R&D faces when they realized we had just obsoleted their exotic hardware plans. We were also pretty cocky at the show because we were already negotiating with Creative Labs.

1996 January

Posted on : 01-01-1996 | By : admin | In : Seer History, Technology Licensing

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

0

19960101 Greg Lee, Marketing

19960108 Microsoft announces WDM to kill NSP
19960115 Intel takes optional non-compete extension
19960115 Intel discloses MMX to Seer
19960122 Intel Re-Releases NSP code (without Native Audio)
19960124 Seer requests Intel approval for Creative deal

NextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnail
9601 namm
960122 INTEL NSP EET ARTICLE
960122 INTEL NSP EET ARTICLE2
9602 awe64bk
9605 reality kbd

19960101 Creative losses: $30M in quarter
19960101 SEEERSYNTH > CREATIVE WAVESYNTH 1.0
19960103 LOI draft
19960111 LOI final / No shop
19960112 National Semiconductor
19960118 NAMM 96 Anaheim: showed SeerSynth & Reality prototype

19960121 Roberta Eklund

19960125 Draft Technology License Agreement (TLA)
19960126 SJ TLA response
19960130 Seer Patent Report
19960131 Reality Biz Plan 2.0

1995 November

Posted on : 01-11-1995 | By : admin | In : Seer History

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

0

19951101 $4M valuation by National Semiconductor
19951107 Seer demos SeerSynth to Creative, Sorkin

19951112 REALITY v.A
19951112 Marty Cutler

19951127 Intel V.P. Avram Miller hears it

19951103 Netscape
19951129 “Disitributed Music” SJ

Evolution of the Seer ’274 Patent

Posted on : 26-09-1995 | By : admin | In : Seer History

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

0

In recent years, the software synthesizer market has come into full swing and digital audio is something that consumers have come to expect in everything from personal computers to mobile phones and cars. In many cases, the manufacturers of these devices have been licensing technology from Seer Systems, whose intellectual property is protected by US Patent #5,886,274. (For details, see What Exactly Is the 274 Patent?)

By the time Seer was awarded the 274 patent, it had developed software synthesizer products for Intel and Creative Labs for the consumer market, and a suite of music production and playback tools for the professional musical instrument market. (As detailed in “The Best Audio Helper App You Never Heard in Your Life.”)

Seer’s retail products have not been upgraded in nearly 10 years and are still only available for Windows 95 and Windows 98. So, why did Seer shift its attention from producing synthesizer products to protecting their intellectual property? The answer is that a combination of powerful technical and business forces caused Seer to drastically shift strategy were it to survive.

First, supporting Microsoft Windows NT and 2000 was impractical. Seer’s line of professional software synthesizers used 80-bit processing and relied on access to the CPU interrupt, to which they had access until Microsoft released Windows NT. In other words, an upgrade of Reality would require more than an upgrade, it would require a rewrite with no guaranty that it would provide the same sound quality as the 80-bit resolution their customers had enjoyed. Seer considered releasing Reality as an open source product,  but legal issues have complicated that path as well. (See “Seer Considering Releasing Reality Code as Open Source.”)

By 1997, Seer’s finances were in trouble. Creative was not actively selling Seer’s software synthesizer upgrade for the Sound Blaster, so royalty payments were nowhere near their projections. Seer founder, Stanley Jungleib recalls, “I was looking for markets. I felt my job was to build something that was investable, so I didn’t work closely on Reality as a product. My product was the company.”

Jungleib had written extensively on music production systems, and even speculated about systems that could leverage General MIDI to adapt to a composition, but until Jungleib heard Seer’s new Reality engine working, even he had not envisioned the comprehensive potential of a software-based music distribution system. “I wrote it down in October, 1995: A Painful Plan for Painless MIDI. I knew it was the Grail but still too early; at the time I didn’t make a big deal about it within Engineering, because they were having enough issues dealing with Creative Labs and Windows as it was.”

Jungleib recalls how discussions with Opcode’s founders, Dave Oppenheim and Chris Halaby created the synergy to most efficiently realize the system. “They had a great sequencer with a great audio handling system and we had the best software host-based synthesizer and Windows realtime engine. We were going to use their suite of Galaxy Editors as different ‘skins’ over the Reality engine. Melding our technologies could make a tool that would solve all these distribution problems for the professional musician.

“So I wrote this 120-page specification on how that would work. How our synthesizer would interface to their sequencer to deliver a totally predictable experience for the user. I had commands such as ‘preload by bar,’ ‘preload by sound number,’ ‘unload by bar number,’ ‘unload this range of bars’…. Breaking it up so the musician would have total control over the music, over what was allocated, when, and how it was delivered. You could draw resources on-the-fly from anywhere on the net, there was a bandwidth simulator … And very importantly as a response to what was going on with mp3 theft, provision was made for the musician to protect their creation. (What you might now call DRM.)”

Unfortunately, in 1998, Opcode was purchased by Gibson, and the joint venture stopped altogether. Sales of Seer products were still suffering, and between the software piracy, and continuing issues with Creative, Seer’s ability to provide livelihoods for its staff of 25 was in jeopardy.

“Only after the company was in really dire financial trouble did I decide to ask my lawyers ‘Can I patent this?’ That was in 1997. The patent was finally awarded in 1999 after several rounds of rejections.”

Ten years on, Jungleib continues to protect Seer’s intellectual property, though some companies underestimate the extent of Seer’s investment in the technology and the validity of the patent.

“There’s a difference between imagining something (like a time machine), and actually committing resources to specifying and building it,” says Jungleib. “At the time, everyone else was committed to their own little hardware platforms. Many still are. But, with Intel as my hardware department, and a synthesizer and effects engine that could redefine itself every 10 milliseconds, I was liberated from all those arbitrary limitations.”

1994 October

Posted on : 01-10-1994 | By : admin | In : Seer History

Tags: , , , , ,

0

19941015 EM reports ICS WaveFront VS

NextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnail
94 09 work ad
9410 REVENUE GRAPHS NM ARTICLE
9410 REVENUE GRAPHS NM ARTICLE2