Featured Posts

  • Prev
  • Next

NAMM Announcement of SeerSynth

Posted on : 18-01-1996 | By : admin | In : Seer History

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

0

First affordable synthesizer with multi-timbral physical modeling.

Back: Frank, David ... Front: Greg, Stanley, Dave
Back: Frank, David
Front: Greg, Stanley, Dave

It was worth doing just for the expression on the Korg R&D faces when they realized we had just obsoleted their exotic hardware plans. We were also pretty cocky at the show because we were already negotiating with Creative Labs.

1995 November

Posted on : 01-11-1995 | By : admin | In : Seer History

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

0

19951101 $4M valuation by National Semiconductor
19951107 Seer demos SeerSynth to Creative, Sorkin

19951112 REALITY v.A
19951112 Marty Cutler

19951127 Intel V.P. Avram Miller hears it

19951103 Netscape
19951129 “Disitributed Music” SJ

1995 October

Posted on : 01-10-1995 | By : admin | In : Seer History

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

0

19951001 SJ Merc reports Intel/MS dealing
19951001 Seer offers Intel progress demo

——-
19951009 95 C Corp Reorganization
19951009 SJ Chair & CEO
19951012 DS President
19951012 David Roach VP R&D
19951012 Frank Kurzawa (FK) VP Eng
19951015 Henry Velick
19951015 Greg Lee consultant
——-

19951020 SJ hears of Creative-Brooktree deal
19951025 SeerSynth version A demoable
19951025 Seer offers Intel demo

19951026 95-00 GENERATION 4: SEERMUSIC
19951026 Original Artwork Net Music

Evolution of the Seer ’274 Patent

Posted on : 26-09-1995 | By : admin | In : Seer History

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

0

In recent years, the software synthesizer market has come into full swing and digital audio is something that consumers have come to expect in everything from personal computers to mobile phones and cars. In many cases, the manufacturers of these devices have been licensing technology from Seer Systems, whose intellectual property is protected by US Patent #5,886,274. (For details, see What Exactly Is the 274 Patent?)

By the time Seer was awarded the 274 patent, it had developed software synthesizer products for Intel and Creative Labs for the consumer market, and a suite of music production and playback tools for the professional musical instrument market. (As detailed in “The Best Audio Helper App You Never Heard in Your Life.”)

Seer’s retail products have not been upgraded in nearly 10 years and are still only available for Windows 95 and Windows 98. So, why did Seer shift its attention from producing synthesizer products to protecting their intellectual property? The answer is that a combination of powerful technical and business forces caused Seer to drastically shift strategy were it to survive.

First, supporting Microsoft Windows NT and 2000 was impractical. Seer’s line of professional software synthesizers used 80-bit processing and relied on access to the CPU interrupt, to which they had access until Microsoft released Windows NT. In other words, an upgrade of Reality would require more than an upgrade, it would require a rewrite with no guaranty that it would provide the same sound quality as the 80-bit resolution their customers had enjoyed. Seer considered releasing Reality as an open source product,  but legal issues have complicated that path as well. (See “Seer Considering Releasing Reality Code as Open Source.”)

By 1997, Seer’s finances were in trouble. Creative was not actively selling Seer’s software synthesizer upgrade for the Sound Blaster, so royalty payments were nowhere near their projections. Seer founder, Stanley Jungleib recalls, “I was looking for markets. I felt my job was to build something that was investable, so I didn’t work closely on Reality as a product. My product was the company.”

Jungleib had written extensively on music production systems, and even speculated about systems that could leverage General MIDI to adapt to a composition, but until Jungleib heard Seer’s new Reality engine working, even he had not envisioned the comprehensive potential of a software-based music distribution system. “I wrote it down in October, 1995: A Painful Plan for Painless MIDI. I knew it was the Grail but still too early; at the time I didn’t make a big deal about it within Engineering, because they were having enough issues dealing with Creative Labs and Windows as it was.”

Jungleib recalls how discussions with Opcode’s founders, Dave Oppenheim and Chris Halaby created the synergy to most efficiently realize the system. “They had a great sequencer with a great audio handling system and we had the best software host-based synthesizer and Windows realtime engine. We were going to use their suite of Galaxy Editors as different ‘skins’ over the Reality engine. Melding our technologies could make a tool that would solve all these distribution problems for the professional musician.

“So I wrote this 120-page specification on how that would work. How our synthesizer would interface to their sequencer to deliver a totally predictable experience for the user. I had commands such as ‘preload by bar,’ ‘preload by sound number,’ ‘unload by bar number,’ ‘unload this range of bars’…. Breaking it up so the musician would have total control over the music, over what was allocated, when, and how it was delivered. You could draw resources on-the-fly from anywhere on the net, there was a bandwidth simulator … And very importantly as a response to what was going on with mp3 theft, provision was made for the musician to protect their creation. (What you might now call DRM.)”

Unfortunately, in 1998, Opcode was purchased by Gibson, and the joint venture stopped altogether. Sales of Seer products were still suffering, and between the software piracy, and continuing issues with Creative, Seer’s ability to provide livelihoods for its staff of 25 was in jeopardy.

“Only after the company was in really dire financial trouble did I decide to ask my lawyers ‘Can I patent this?’ That was in 1997. The patent was finally awarded in 1999 after several rounds of rejections.”

Ten years on, Jungleib continues to protect Seer’s intellectual property, though some companies underestimate the extent of Seer’s investment in the technology and the validity of the patent.

“There’s a difference between imagining something (like a time machine), and actually committing resources to specifying and building it,” says Jungleib. “At the time, everyone else was committed to their own little hardware platforms. Many still are. But, with Intel as my hardware department, and a synthesizer and effects engine that could redefine itself every 10 milliseconds, I was liberated from all those arbitrary limitations.”

1995 August

Posted on : 01-08-1995 | By : admin | In : Seer History

Tags: , , , ,

0

19950801 Seer integrates Sondius technology

19950802 Public: Microsoft forces Intel to eat NSP

Try Another Plan

Posted on : 01-05-1995 | By : admin | In : Seer History

Tags: ,

0

NextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnail
Page 01
Page 02
Page 03
Page 04
Page 05
Page 06
Page 07
Page 08
Page 09
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25

#5,977,469 Real-time Waveform Substituting Sound Engine

Posted on : 02-12-1994 | By : admin | In : Seer History

Tags: , , , ,

0

Date of Conception 19941202.
Application 08/784,372

A sound engine in a processor-based system utilizing real-time synthesis optimizes synthesis time, maximizes the number of fully-synthesized sound requests and preserves currently excessive sound requests. During synthesis, the sound engine attempts to full-synthesize all requests. If the sound engine determines that remaining sound requests are excessive and cannot be fully-synthesized, it preserves each excessive request by synthesizing a substitute waveform segment. If the sound engine determines that limiting the number of preserved requests is required, it synthesizes a concluding waveform segment for and then discards selected requests during selected synthesis intervals. Both substitute-synthesis and discarding of sound requests are achieved with minimized detrimental impact on ongoing sound performances.

Issued 19991102.
This was basically a vanity patent of questionable value that I allowed, and allowed to expired.

1994 June

Posted on : 01-06-1994 | By : admin | In : Seer History

Tags: , ,

0

19940612 Seer complaints about ICS nonsales, Intel inattention.

1993 January

Posted on : 01-01-1993 | By : admin | In : Seer History

Tags: , , , , ,

0

NextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnailNextGen ScrollGallery thumbnail
9300 SEER LOGO SKETCH (1)
CONTROL
DRIVERS
DSCF1160 (1)
Future Synth
Seer-Systems-Logo
icon logo
scan_7414235240_1
seer logo

1992 December

Posted on : 01-12-1992 | By : admin | In : Seer History

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

0

19921214 Seer Systems Incorporated
19921215 Satie 93 Initial Development
19921215 Stanley Jungleib (SJ) President
19921215 Dave Smith (DS) Eng Mgr
19921215 David Roach Staff Eng
19921215 Frank Kurzawa (FK) Staff Eng
19921215 Alan Fitzgerald, consulting sound designer
19921231 Intel Product Development Agreement for Satie signed
19921231 Satie Contract Specification